|
STUDY OF GAMES CONTRIBUTION IN DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR
2
Author(s):
MR. PERMOD KUMAR,MR. RAKESH SEJWAL
Vol - 5, Issue- 2 ,
Page(s) : 167 - 170
(2014 )
DOI : https://doi.org/10.32804/BBSSES
Abstract
Gameand Sports has been put to several uses in philosophy. Responding to two papers by W.V.O. Quine (1960, 1967), Lewis (1969) used game theory to develop a philosophical account of convention. In so doing, he provided the first analysis of common knowledge and employed it in analyzing play in coordination games. In addition, he first suggested that one can understand meaning in terms of signaling games. This later suggestion has been pursued by several philosophers since Lewis (Skyrms (1996), Grim, Kokalis, and Alai-Tafti et al. (2004)). FollowingLewis (1969) game-theoretic account of conventions, Edna Ullmann-Margalit (1977) and Bicchieri (2006) have developed theories of social norms that define them as Nash equilibria that result from transforming a mixed-motive game into a coordination game.
- • Martin Shubik (1978). "Game Theory: Economic Applications," in W. Kruskal and J.M. Tanur, ed., International Encyclopedia of Statistics, v. 2, pp. 372–78. • Robert Aumann and Sergiu Hart, ed. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications (scrollable to chapter-outline or abstract links):1992. v. 1; 1994. v. 2; 2002. v. 3.
- Game-theoretic model to examine the two tradeoffs in the acquisition of information for a careful balancing act Research paper INSEAD
- Options Games: Balancing the trade-off between flexibility and commitment. Europeanfinancialreview.com (2012-02-15). Retrieved on 2013-01-03.
- Morrison, Andrew Stumpff, "Eminent Legal Philosophers, or Yes, Law is the Command of the Sovereign", at 8-12 (2013). Available at SSRN
- Wood, Peter John. (2011, February). "Climate change and game theory," Ecological Economics Review 1219: 153-70.
|